Extra Judicial Killings in India

 Extra judicial killing refers to the killing of a person by the state or its agents without any legal process. In India, extra judicial killing has been a matter of concern for a long time. Despite the constitutional provisions that guarantee the right to life and liberty to every citizen, extra judicial killings continue to take place in the country.


Extra judicial killings are often carried out by the police or other security forces in the name of maintaining law and order. The police often justify such killings by claiming that the person killed was a criminal or a terrorist. However, in many cases, it has been found that the person killed was innocent and had no connection with any criminal or terrorist activity.

The problem of extra judicial killing is particularly acute in areas affected by insurgency or terrorism. In such areas, security forces are given extraordinary powers to deal with the situation. However, these powers are often misused, resulting in the killing of innocent people.

One of the most high-profile cases of extra judicial killing in India is the encounter of Ishrat Jahan and three others in Gujarat in 2004. The police claimed that they were terrorists who were planning to assassinate Narendra Modi, who was then the chief minister of Gujarat. However, it was later found that they were innocent and had no connection with any terrorist activity.

Another case that highlights the problem of extra judicial killing is the killing of 19-year-old Nido Tania in Delhi in 2014. Nido was a student from Arunachal Pradesh who was beaten to death by a group of men in a market in Delhi. The incident sparked widespread protests and raised questions about racism and discrimination against people from North East India. Latest example can be the the accused rapists of the Hyderabad doctor in November 2019 who were allegedly encounter by the police itself.

The problem of extra judicial killing is not limited to a particular region or community. It is a systemic problem that needs to be addressed urgently. The government needs to take strong measures to ensure that the police and other security forces do not misuse their powers and that the rights of citizens are protected.

In conclusion, extra judicial killing is a serious violation of human rights and a threat to democracy. It is the responsibility of the government to ensure that every citizen is protected and that justice is delivered in a fair and impartial manner. The problem of extra judicial killing needs to be addressed urgently, and steps need to be taken to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.

Comments